Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2015, 23(5):3-23 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.483

Institutional Determinants of Investment Inflows into Transition Economies

Victoria Donu, Martin Janíčko
Charles University, Prague (email: victoria.donu@gmail.com); College of Banking (email: martin.janicko@moodys.com).

This article investigates the relationship between institutional quality and the level of investment inflows into post-communist countries. We attempt to empirically verify the argument that institutional determinants are essential in explaining the variation in investment inflows into transition economies after the demise of socialism in the early 1990s. The role of institutions is assessed using Economic Freedom indices provided by the Heritage Foundation. Consequently, to investigate the progress of institutional quality in transition economies, we further employ indicators developed by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Using a panel data set for 11 transition countries from 1993 to 2013, we conclude that the impact of institutional quality on investment inflows is not negligible, yet much weaker than suggested by the existing theoretical literature. Using a fixed-effects model framework in both regression benchmarks with metrics from the Heritage Foundation and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, respectively, we observe that the impact of institutional variables on the level of investment was less significant than expected. Moreover, macroeconomic fundamentals appear to always play a more substantial role than institutional factors.

Keywords: foreign direct investment, institutional determinants, fundamentals, post-communist economies, panel data, Visegrad, Balkans, Baltics
JEL classification: F21, F23, H11, K20

Published: August 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Donu, V., & Janíčko, M. (2015). Institutional Determinants of Investment Inflows into Transition Economies. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia23(5), 3-23. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.483
Download citation

References

  1. AKAY, S., 2001. Is Corruption an Obstacle for Foreign Investors in Developing Countries? A Cross-Country Evidence. Yapi Kredi Economic Review. Issue 12, pp. 27-34. ISSN 1019-1232.
  2. ALI, F.; FIESS, N. and MACDONALD, R., 2008. Do Institutions Matter for Foreign Direct Investment? [Working Paper 2008/26, online]. University of Glasgow. [accessed May 28, 2015]. Available at http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_92803_en.pdf.
  3. ASIEDU, E., 2002. On the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries. Is Africa Different? World Development Journal. Issue 1, pp. 107-119. ISSN 0305-750X. Go to original source...
  4. BALTAGI, B.H. and KAO, C., 2000. Nonstationary panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: A survey [Working Paper No. 16, online]. Center for Policy Research. ISSN 15253066. [accessed June 3, 2015]. Available at: http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1135&context=cpr. Go to original source...
  5. BARREL, R. and PAIN, N., 1996. An econometric analysis of U.S. foreign direct investment. Review of Economics and Statistics. Issue 2, pp. 200-207.ISSN 0034-6535. Go to original source...
  6. BEVAN, A. and ESTRIN, S., 2000. The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies [William Davidson Institute Working Paper 342, online]. Centre for New and Emerging Markets, London School of Economics. [accessed May 25, 2015]. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.124.8766&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  7. BISSOON, O., 2011. Can Better Institutions Attract More Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)? Evidence from Developing Countries [online]. International Conference of Applied Economics - COAE in Kazan, pp. 59-70. [accessed June 3, 2015]. Available at: http://kastoria.teikoz.gr/icoae2/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/007.pdf.
  8. BOTRIC, V. and SKUFLIC, L., 2006. Main determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in the Southeast European Countries. Transition Studies Review. Issue 2, pp. 359-377. ISSN 1614-4007. Go to original source...
  9. BUSSE, M. and HEFEKER, C., 2005. Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment [HWWA Discussion Paper 315]. Hamburg Institute of International Economics. ISSN 16164814. Go to original source...
  10. CARSTENSEN, K. and TOUBAL, F., 2004. Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern European Countries: a dynamic panel analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics. Issue 32, pp. 3-22. ISSN 0147-5967. Go to original source...
  11. CHAKRABARTI, A., 2001. The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Sensitivity Analyses of Cross-Country Regressions. International Review for Social Sciences - Kyklos. Issue 1, pp. 89-114. ISSN 1467-6435. Go to original source...
  12. DANIELE, V. and MARANI, U., 2006. Do institutions matter for FDI: A comparative analysis of the MENA countries [MPRA Paper No. 2426, online]. Munich Personal RePEcArchive. [accessed June 9, 2015]. Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2426/17. Go to original source...
  13. DAUDE, C. and STEIN, E., 2007. The Quality of Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment. Economics and Politics. Issue 3, pp. 317-344. ISSN 1468-0343. Go to original source...
  14. DEMEKAS, D.; HORVATH, B.; RIBAKOVA, E. and YI, W., 2005. Foreign direct investment in Southeastern Europe: How (and How much) can policies help? [Working Paper No. 05/110, online]. International Monetary Fund, European Department. [accessed June 10, 2015]. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2005/wp05110.pdf.
  15. DUMLUDAG, D., 2009. Political Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment flows into Developing countries [online]. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. [accessed June 12, 2015]. Available at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27327/1/MPRA_paper_27327.pdf.
  16. DUNNING, J. H., 1988. Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the Multinational Enterprise: A search for an Eclectic Approach in Explaining International Production. In Explaining International Production. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 33-47. ISBN 0-04-44517-9.
  17. DUNNING, J. H., 1993. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. ISBN 978-1-84376-525-7.
  18. EGGER, P. and WINNER, H., 2005. Evidence on corruption as an incentive for foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy. Issue 4, pp. 932-952. ISSN 0176-2680. Go to original source...
  19. FABRY, N. and ZEGHNI, S., 2006. How former communist countries in Europe attract inward foreign direct investment? A matter of institutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. Issue 2, pp. 201-219. ISSN 0967-067X. Go to original source...
  20. GARIBALDI, P. and MAURO, P., 2002. Anatomy of Employment Growth. Economic Policy. A European forum. Oxford University Press, pp. 69-113. ISSN 0266-4658.
  21. GRCIC, B. and BABIC, Z., 2003. The determinants of FDI: Evaluation of transition countries attractiveness for foreign investors [online]. "Fifth International Conference on "Enterprise in transition on 2003; Split". Faculty of Economics, University of Split. [accessed June 28, 2015]. Available at: https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/203502.Vlahinic-Dizdarevic_Biljan-August_Split_2005.pdf.
  22. HERITAGE FOUNDATION, 2015. Index of Economic Freedom [online]. [accessed December 28, 2014]. Heritage Foundation. Available at: www.heritage.org/index/.
  23. HOLLAND, D. and PAIN, N., 1998. The Determinants and the Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in the Transition economies: A Panel Data Analysis [Project No. P96-6086-R, online]. National Institute of Economic and Social Research London. [accessed April 18, 2015]. Available at: http://www.niesr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publications/140807_123032.pdf.
  24. JANICKI, H. and WUNNAVA, P., 2004. Determinants of foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from EU accession candidates. Journal of Applied Economics. Issue 5, pp. 505-509. ISSN 1514-0326. Go to original source...
  25. JENSEN, N., 2003. Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization. Issue 3, pp. 587-616. ISSN 0020-8183. Go to original source...
  26. KERSAN-SKABIC, I., 2013. Institutional development as a determinant of FDI attractiveness in Southeastern Europe. Drustvena istrazivanja. Issue 2, pp. 215-235. ISSN 1330-0288. Go to original source...
  27. NORTH, D., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-52139734-6.
  28. NORTH, D., 2005. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691145952.
  29. POURNARAKIS, M. and VARSAKELIS, N.C., 2002. Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern European Countries: Do Institutions Matter [online]? Presented at the EIBA Annual Conference. December 2002, Athens, Greece. [accessed June 5, 2015]. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.195.993&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  30. RANJAN, V. and AGRAWAL, G., 2011. FDI Inflows Determinants in BRIC countries: A Panel Data Analysis. International Business Research. Issue 4, pp. 255-263. ISSN 1913-9004. Go to original source...
  31. RODRIK, D., 1999. Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict and growth collapses. Journal of Economic Growth. Issue 4, pp. 358-412. ISSN 1381-4338. Go to original source...
  32. SUSJAN, A.; REDEK, T. and KOSTEVC, C., 2007. Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Environment in Transitional Economies. Transition Studies Review. Issue 1, pp. 40-54. ISSN 1614-4007. Go to original source...
  33. WHEELER, D. and MODY, A., 1992. International Investment Location Decisions: The Case of U.S. firms. Journal of International Economics. Issue 1-2, pp. 57-76. ISSN 0022-1996. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.