Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2007, 15(7):448-459 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.232

Boycott of German Goods in Poland, 1933-1935

Jerzy Tomaszewski
Prof. dr hab. Jerzy Tomaszewski - vědecký pracovník; Stowarzyszenie Żydowski Instytut Historyczny w Polsce, Warszawa (rawiw@neostrada.pl).

Anti-Jewish riots in Germany were the reason for a proposal of economic boycott presented by delegates from Poland at the Jewish Congress in Geneva in August 1932. A similar proposal was presented at the session of the Executive Committee of the American Jewish Congress in March 1933. The AJC proclaimed the boycott only in August of that year. The Jewish members of the Parliament in Poland proclaimed boycott as early as March 15, 1933. This was the beginning of the boycott campaign which was directed in Poland by the United Jewish Committee for Countervailing Persecution of Jews in Germany (Zjednoczony Komitet Żydowski do walki z prze¶ladowaniem Żydów w Niemczech). Local committees were created and the boycott was supported by the trade unions.
The persecution of Jews in Germany affected Polish citizens and also influenced Polish-German relations. Polish official representatives in Germany engaged themselves in their defense; the boycott supported Polish diplomacy. From the end of May 1933, Polish-German relations were slowly changing for the better. The boycott became embarrassing for Poland after signing the German-Polish declaration on the nonuse of force. The Central Committee of the boycott had to cease its activities in June 1935. This was not the end of the boycott however it could no longer be promoted openly.
It would be impossible to estimate the boycott's impact on the German economy. Fragmentary information indicates that certain branches suffered. The economic as well as moral significance of the boycott was however diminished because of the agreement between the Jewish Agency and the Third Reich (Ha-avara Agreement). Germany agreed to allow Jews to emigrate with a part of their capital, however on a condition that this could only be done in the form of export of German industrial goods. The agreement was the subject of violent arguments at the Zionist Congresses.

Keywords: boycott, Germany 1933-1935, Poland 1933-1935, persecution of Jews 1932-1935

Published: December 1, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tomaszewski, J. (2007). Boycott of German Goods in Poland, 1933-1935. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia15(7), 448-459. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.232
Download citation

References

  1. AAN Berlin: Archiwum Akt Nowych w Warszawie, Ambasada RP w Berlinie, teczki 793, 863,2521.
  2. AAN, MSZ: Archiwum Akt Nowych w Warszawie, Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicz-nych, teczki 4621. 7110
  3. APPENSZLAK, J. (1935): Wsieci transferu. Nasz Przeglyd 20 IX 1935 r., s. 6 Go to original source...
  4. b.f. (1933): Konsument obok celnika. Gospodarka Narodowa 1933 nr 15-16, s. 262.
  5. EIGER, A: (1934): Blaski i nqdza bojkotu. Tygodnik ®ydowski - Judisches Volksblatt 1934 nr 4, s. 1.
  6. FEILCHENFELD, W. - MICHAELIS, D. - PINNER, L. (1972): Haavara-Transfer nach Palastina und Einwanderung deurschen Juden 1933-1939. Tubingen 1972.
  7. GOTTLIEB, M.: Boycott, Anti-Nazi: Encyclopaedia Judaica - CD-ROM Edition
  8. HAFFTKA, A. (1934): Miqdzynarodowa konferencja bojkotowa antyhitlerowska w Londynie. Sprawy Narodowosciowe 1934 nr 5-6, s. 703.
  9. HAFFTKA,A. (1935) Sprawy ľydowskie. XIX Kongres Syjonistyczny w Lucer-nie. Sprawy Narodowosciowe 1935 nr 5, s. 538.
  10. HAFFTKA, A. (1934) Sprawy ľydowskie. Swiatowa Konferencja ®ydowska w Genewie. Sprawy Narodowosciowe 1934 nr 5-6, s. 700.
  11. HALPERN, L. (1933, s. 239): Przesladowanie ®ydów w Niemczech a ľydostwopolskie. Sprawy Narodowosciowe 1933 nr2-3, s. 239. Go to original source...
  12. HALPERN, L. (1933, s. 259): Przesladowanie ®ydów w Niemczech i swiatowa akcja protestacyjna. Sprawy Narodowosciowe 1933 nr2-3, s. 259
  13. HARTGLAS, A. (1934): Bojkot. Nasza Obrona 1934 nr 2, s. 3.
  14. HILBERG, R. The Destruction of the European Jews. New York 1961.
  15. LETOCHA, B. - CALA, A. - GLOWICKA, Z. (1999): Dokumenty ľycia spolecznego ®ydów polskich (1918-1939) w zbiorach Biblioteki Narodowej [katalog], Warszawa 1999.
  16. MELZER, E. (1982): Ha-cherem ha-kalkali ha-jehudi ha-anti-germani be-Polin be-szanim 1933-1934. Gal-ed on the History of the Jews in Poland, 1982 vol. VI, s. 149-166 [resumé: The Anti-German Economic Boycott by Polish Jewry in 1933-1934, s. X-XI]
  17. MELZER, E. (1997): No Way Out. ThePolitics of Polish Jewry 1935-1939, Cincinna-ti 1997, s. 9 Go to original source...
  18. Nasza obrona (1933): "Nasza Obrona" 1933 nr 1, s. 2.
  19. Perspektywy (1933): Perspektywy ľydowskie w Niemczech. "Nasz Przeglíd" 18 II 1933, s. 4.
  20. PIERWSZY (1935): Pierwszyproces o zniewaľenie kanclerza Hitlera. Nasz Przeglíd 9 VII 1935, s. 9.
  21. RPG (1933): "Robotniczy Przeglíd Gospodarczy" 1933 nr 8, s. 97.
  22. SCHIPER, I. (1937): Dzieje handlu ľydowskiego na ziemiach polskich, Warszawa 1937.
  23. SCHIMITZEK, S. (1976): Drogi i bezdroľa minionej epoki. Wspomnienia z latpracy w MSZ (1920-1939). Warszawa 1976.
  24. Sprawa (1935): Sprawa transferu naplenum Kongresu. "Nasz Przeglíd" 4IX1935, s. 4.
  25. [SZEMBEK, J.] (1964): Diariusz i teki Jana Szembeka (1935-1945). Tom I. Oprac. T. Komarnicki. Londyn 1964.
  26. TENNENBAUM, J. (1959): Anti-Nazi Boycott Movement in the United States. Yad Vashem Sudies 1959, vol. 3.
  27. Upadek (1934): Upadek Hamburga na skutek bojkotu ľydowskiego. Tygodnik ®ydowski 1934 nr 22, s. 1.
  28. WISLICKI, A.: The Jewish Boycott Campaign against Nazi Germany and its Culmi-nation in the Halbersztadt Trial. "Polin. Studies in Polish Jewr y" 1994 vol. 8, s. 282-289. Go to original source...
  29. Wzmoľenie (1933): Wzmoľenie Akcji Bojkotowej. "Tygodnik ®ydowski - Judisches Volksblatt" 1933 nr 48 (9. XII. 1933), s. 1.
  30. YAHIJA, Y.:Die Zionisten undNazi-Deutschland. Kopiana C-D Romie, s. 12-15
  31. Zakaz (1935): Zakaz dziaíalnosci Komitetu Antyhitlerowskiego. "Nasz Przeglyd" 4 VII 1935, s. 2.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.