Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2019, 27(3-4):31-44 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.626

Value Preferences and Frustration in the Workplace

Martina Glaserová
University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Management

A long-term personnel crisis, especially among nursing staff, has been tormenting the Czech healthcare sector despite the fact that average salaries are continuously increasing. Therefore, the financial remuneration factor is not decisive for employee retention. There are a number of other factors influencing the turnover rate, such as job satisfaction and the role of clarity although this paper deals with the influence of value preferences. The aim of the study was to map the value preferences of employees in two departments of a selected healthcare facility. Technical staff members work for the first department while the other department involved medical staff. The comparison also focused on the values that were attributed by the employees to the organisation. Furthermore, the extent of the value setting by managers reflected in their management style and how it affects the frustration of their subordinates was investigated. The data needed to evaluate the above-mentioned objectives was obtained through a questionnaire based on The Portrait Value Questionnaire. The data obtained was converted into comparable values and further evaluated through the calculation of mean values and correlation analysis. It was found in selected workplaces of the given organisation that the individual value settings of employees and their perception of organisational values do not match. Furthermore, the frustration experienced by staff in a given workplace is related to the management style of their superiors, which is affected by their value preferences. By identifying the value setting of employees and its alignment with the organisation, it is possible to better understand the internal environment of the organisation in connection with the effort to retain employees and with regard to their further motivation and achieving alignment with the values of the organisation.

Keywords: value preferences, frustration, employee retention, turnover, organisational values, HR management
JEL classification: J53, Z13

Accepted: March 2, 2020; Published: May 31, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Glaserová, M. (2019). Value Preferences and Frustration in the Workplace. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia27(3-4), 31-44. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.626
Download citation

References

  1. Johnson, R.E., and Jackson, E.M. (2009). Appeal of Organizational Values is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Moderating Role of Employee Identity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(4), pp. 915-933. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X373914 Go to original source...
  2. Judge, T.A., and Bretz, R.D. (1992). Effects of Work Values on Job Choice Decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), pp. 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.261 Go to original source...
  3. Kang, J.H., Matusik, J.G., and Barclay, L.A. (2017). Affective and Normative Motives to Work Overtime in Asian Organizations: Four Cultural Orientations from Confucian Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(1), pp. 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2683-4 Go to original source...
  4. Longo, Y., Gunz, A., Curtis, G.J., and Farsides, T. (2016). Measuring Need Satisfaction and Frustration in Educational and Work Contexts: The Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (NSFS). Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), pp. 295-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9595-3 Go to original source...
  5. Pelletier, K.L. (2010). Leader Toxicity: An Empirical Investigation of Toxic Behavior and Rhetoric. Leadership, 6(4), pp. 373-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715010379308 Go to original source...
  6. Pinder, C.C. (2008). Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  7. Ryan, R.M., and Deci, E.L. (2002). Overview of Self-Determination Theory: An Organismic-Dialectical Perspective. In Deci E.L. and R.M. Ryan, eds. Handbook of Self-Determination Research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  8. Schwartz, S.H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116 Go to original source...
  9. Sheldon, K.M., and Gunz, A. (2009). Psychological Needs as Basic Motives, Not Just Experiential Requirements. Journal of Personality, 77(5), pp. 1467-1492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00589.x Go to original source...
  10. Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., and Näswall, K. (2002). No Security: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Job Insecurity and Its Consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(3), pp. 242-264. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.7.3.242 Go to original source...
  11. Thoroughgood, C.N., Sawyer, K.B., Padilla, A., and Lunsford, L. (2018). Destructive Leadership: A Critique of Leader-Centric Perspectives and Toward a More Holistic Definition. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(3), pp. 627-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3257-9 Go to original source...
  12. Vander Elst, T., Van den Broeck, A., De Witte, H., and De Cuyper, N. (2012). The Mediating Role of Frustration of Psychological Needs in the Relationship between Job Insecurity and Work-Related Well-Being. Work & Stress, 26(3), pp. 252-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.703900 Go to original source...
  13. Verquer, M.L., Beehr, T.A., and Wagner, S.H. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of Relations between Person-Organization Fit and Work Attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), pp. 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2 Go to original source...
  14. Výrost, J., and Slaměník, I. (2008). Sociální psychologie [Social Psychology]. Praha: Grada.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.