Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2018, 26(4):42-50 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.611

VALUE ADDED TAX IN REORGANISATION

Václav ®alud, Jan Králíček
Václav ®alud is an attorney-at-law and Jan Králíček is an articling attorney clerk, both working in the international law firm Dentons (https://www.dentons.com/en/)

This paper discusses the current Czech and European legal framework applicable to the adjustment to the taxable amount with respect to claims partially cancelled due to the insolvency of the customer resolved by reorganisation. The partial cancellation, according to the authors, serves as grounds to adjust a taxable amount under the EU VAT Directive. The supplier is entitled to issue a corrective invoice and claim a refund of a proportion of the VAT paid with respect to the delivery of goods or services to an insolvent debtor. However, such practice is not yet followed by the Czech tax authorities who do not allow for a reduction of a taxable amount in reorganisation and only allow such reductions in the case of bankruptcy liquidation. The paper argues that this approach is not compatible with European law. Moreover, such a different treatment of VAT payers in bankruptcy liquidation (resulting in higher satisfaction of VAT taxpayers as creditors) puts reorganisation at a considerable disadvantage and is contrary to the basic principles of insolvency law. Finally, the paper argues that the corresponding claim of the tax authority resulting from the VAT base adjustment constitutes a standard pre-insolvency claim and should not be preferred in the insolvency proceedings under Czech law.

Keywords: reorganisation, value added tax, insolvency,
JEL classification: H25, K34

Published: December 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
®alud, V., & Králíček, J. (2018). VALUE ADDED TAX IN REORGANISATION. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia26(4), 42-50. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.611
Download citation

References

  1. Schönfeld, J. (2015). Insolvency Proceedings - Expectations, Reality, Future [online]. Available at: http://www.vyzkuminsolvence.cz/data/files/2015-senat-seminar/6-schonfeld-reorganizace-vs-sanacni-konkurz.pdf [Accessed 15 May 2018]
  2. Judgment of 7 October 2010, Loyalty Management UK and Baxi Group, C-53/09 and C-55/09, EU:C:2010:590
  3. Judgment of 12 October 2017, Lombard Ingatlan Lízing, C-404/16, EU:C:2017:759
  4. Judgment of 15 May 2014, Almos Agrárkülkereskedelmi Kft, C‑337/13, EU:C:2014:328
  5. Judgment of 20 June 2013, Newey, C-653/11, EU:C:2013:409
  6. Judgment of 22 February 2018, T-2, druľba za ustvarjanje, razvoj in trľenje elektronskih komunikacij in opreme, d.o.o., C-396/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:109
  7. Judgment of 23 November 2017, Di Maura, C-246/16, EU:C:2017:887 Go to original source...
  8. Decision of the High Court in Olomouc of 19 March 2013, Ref. No. 3 VSOL 19/2013-B-113
  9. Decision of the High Court in Prague of 24 September 2015, Ref. No. 101 VSPH 343/2015-49
  10. Decision of the High Court in Olomouc of 7 September 2016, Ref. No. 11 VSOL 6/2016-57
  11. Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added taxInterpretative opinion No. 6 of the Expert Group for Insolvency Law of 4 October 2011
  12. Act No. 182/2006 Coll., on insolvency and methods of its solution
  13. Act No. 235/2004 Coll., on value added tax
  14. Act No. 294/2013 Coll., amending Act No. 182/2006 Coll., on insolvency and methods of its solution (Insolvency Act)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.