Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2016, 24(1):3-14 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.495

The impact of Institutional Distance on FDI inflows in the Czech Republic

Pietro Andrea Podda
Anglo American University in Prague (pietro.podda@aauni.edu).

This paper studies the impact of institutional distance on FDI inflows in a specific country, the Czech Republic. This study contributes to the literature on the importance of institutional distance between home and host country among the factors able to influence FDI. The novelty of our paper is that (1) we consider whether institutional distance matters also when the host country is already endowed with institutional standards relatively close to those of the main home countries of MNEs, and (2) we run separate investigations of home-host countries' institutional distance, distinguishing between institutionally safer and less safe home countries in comparison with the host ones. The Czech Republic has been chosen in view of these perspectives, as (1) it has traditionally been considered as one of the most developed markets among those emerged from the socialist experience, its level of institutional development is close to that of the various home countries of MNEs, and (2) besides hosting MNEs from home countries endowed with safer institutions, it receives a certain amount of FDI also from countries with a relatively less safe institutional environment. Our results challenge the previous literature, in the sense that institutional distance may actually be perceived as an opportunity, especially by MNEs from home countries with higher levels of institutional development. Indeed, MNEs from home countries with less safe institutions than Czech ones follow a more ambiguous pattern.

Keywords: FDI, Institutions, institutional distance, Czech Republic, random effects, gravity model
JEL classification: M1

Published: February 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Podda, P.A. (2016). The impact of Institutional Distance on FDI inflows in the Czech Republic. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 24(1), 3-14. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.495
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AL SADIG, A., 2009. The Effects of Corruption on FDI inflows. Cato Journal. Issue 2, 267-294. ISSN 19433468.
    2. ALEKSYNSKA, M. and HAVRYLCHYK, O., 2013. FDI from the south: The role of institutional distance and natural resources. European Journal of Political Economy. Issue 3, 38-53. ISSN 0176-2680. Go to original source...
    3. ARSLAN, A. and LARIMO, J., 2010. Ownership Strategy of Multinational Enterprises and the Impacts of Regulative and Normative Institutional Distance: Evidence from Finnish Foreign Direct Investments in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of East - West Business. Issue 3, 179-200. ISSN 1066-9868. Go to original source...
    4. COASE, R., 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics. Issue 1, 1-44. ISSN 0022-2186. Go to original source...
    5. CUERVO-CAZURRA, A., 2006. Who cares about Corruption? Journal of International Business Studies. Issue 6, 807-822. ISSN 0047-2506. Go to original source...
    6. DUNNING, J. H., 1980. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies. Issue 1, 9-31. ISSN 0047-2506. Go to original source...
    7. DUNNING, J. H. and LUNDAN, S. M., 2008. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. ISBN 978 1 84376 525 7.
    8. FABRY, N. and ZEGHNI, S. 2006. How former communist countries of Europe may attract inward foreign direct investment? A matter of institutions. Communist andpost-Communist Studies. Issue 2, 301-319. ISSN 0967-067X. Go to original source...
    9. NORTH, D. C., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0 521 39416 3.
    10. NORTH, D. C., 2005. Understanding the process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691145952.
    11. PODDA, P. A., 2010. The Impact of Host Institutions on inward-FDI in the Czech Republic [doctoral dissertation]. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.
    12. PODDA, P. A. and TSAGDIS, D., 2006. The importance of host institutions for foreign investors: a qualitative enquiry in the Czech Republic. Proceedings of the 14th conference on Business and Marketing Strategies in Central and Eastern Europe, High School of Economics of Vienna and De Paul University of Chicago, Vienna, December 2006.
    13. PODDA, P. A. and TSAGDIS, D., 2007. A desegregated analysis of the impact of corruption on FDI in the Czech Republic. Proceedings of the 15th conference on Business and Marketing Strategies in Central and Eastern Europe, High School of Economics of Vienna and De Paul University of Chicago, Vienna, December 2007.
    14. TINBERGER, J., 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund. ISBN 9780527028367.
    15. ZAHEER, S., 1995. Overcoming the liability of the foreigner. Academy of Management Journal. Issue 2, 341-363. ISSN 1571-5027. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content