Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2014, 22(6):3-18 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.455

Influence of IFRS on Earnings Manipulation: Evidence from the European Union

Tereza Miková
Department of Financial Accounting and Auditing, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67, Prague 3, Czech Republic, tereza.mikova@vse.cz.

This paper analyzes the influence of one uniform accounting rule on accounting quality by investigating the effect of IFRS on earnings management. The paper examines whether IFRS adoption is associated with lower earnings manipulation measured by discretionary accruals, a commonly used method. It focuses on European Union membership among countries with both the common-law tradition and the code-law tradition. It investigates a sample of 603 companies (10,251 firm-year observations) during the years 1992-2013. The finding contributes to current accounting debate with the empirical evidence that earnings management did not decline after IFRS adoption. In the European Union itself, the research sample contains a very little portion of companies which show increased reporting quality, more precisely earnings management, on IFRS. Overall, the results do not support the assumption that IFRS have an improving impact on reporting quality and demonstrate that other relevant factors should be considered in creating more efficient capital markets.

Keywords: accounting quality, discretionary accruals, earnings management, earnings manipulation, international financial accounting standards
JEL classification: G38, M41

Published: October 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Miková, T. (2014). Influence of IFRS on Earnings Manipulation: Evidence from the European Union. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 22(6), 3-18. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.455
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AHMED, A. S.; CHALMERS, K.; KHLIF, H. A Meta-analysis of IFRS Adoption Effects. The International Journal of Accounting. 2013, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 173-217. Go to original source...
    2. ALI, A.; HWANG, L. S. Country-Specific Factors to Financial Reporting and the Value Relevance of Accounting Data [online]. 1999, Retrieved April 28, 2014 [cit. 2014-05-15] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=181279.
    3. ARMSTRONG, C. S.; BARTH, M. E; JAGOLINZER, A. D.; RIEDL, E. J. Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe. The Accounting Review. 2010, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 31-61. Go to original source...
    4. ATWOOD, T J.; DRAKE, M. S.; MYERS, J. N.; MYERS L. A. Do earnings reported under IFRS tell us more about future earnings and cash flows? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2011, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 103-121. Go to original source...
    5. AUBERT, F.; GRUDNITSKI, G. Analysts' estimates What they could be telling us about the impact of IFRS on earnings management in Europe. Review of Accounting and Finance. 2012, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53-72. Go to original source...
    6. BALL, R.; ROBIN, A.; WU, J. S. Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2003, vol. 36, no. 1-3, pp. 235-270. Go to original source...
    7. BALL, R. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research. 2006, vol. 36 (special issue), pp. 5-27. Go to original source...
    8. BARTH, M. E.; LANDSMAN, W. R., LANG, M. H. International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research. 2008, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 467-498. Go to original source...
    9. BRADSHAW, M. T; BUSHEE, B. J.; MILLER, G. S. Accounting Choice, Home Bias, and U.S. Investment in Non-U.S. Firms. Journal of Accounting Research. 2004, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 795-841. Go to original source...
    10. BRUGGERMANN, U.; HITZ, J. M.; SELLHORN, T 2013. Intended and Unintended Consequences of Mandatory IFRS Adoption: A Review of Extent Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research. European Accounting Review. 2013, vol. 22 no. 1, pp. 1-37. Go to original source...
    11. BURGSTAHLER, D. C.; HAIL, L.; LEUZ, C. 2006. The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management in European Private and Public Firms. The Accounting Review. 2006, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 983-1016. Go to original source...
    12. CALLAO, S.; JARNE, J. I. 2010. Have IFRS Affected Earnings Management in the European Union. Accounting in Europe. 2010, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 159-189. Go to original source...
    13. CORVIG, V. M.; DEFOND, M. L.; HUNG, M. 2007. Home Bias, Foreign Mutual Fund Holdings, and the Voluntary Adoption of International Accounting Standards. Journal of Accounting Research. 2007, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 41-70. Go to original source...
    14. DAO, T H. P 2008. Monitoring Compliance with IFRS: Some Insights from the French Regulatory System. Accounting in Europe. 2005, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 107-135. Go to original source...
    15. DASKE, H. 2008. Mandatory IFRS Reporting around World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences. Journal of Accounting Research. 2008, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1085-1142. Go to original source...
    16. DASKE, H.; GEBHART, G. 2006. International Financial Reporting Standards and Experts' Perceptions of Disclosure Quality. A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies. 2006, vol. 42, no. 3-4, pp. 461-498. Go to original source...
    17. DING, Y, HOPE, O.-K.; JEANJEAN, T.; STOLOWY, H. 2007. Differences between domestic accounting standards and IAS: Measurement determinants and implications. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2007, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-38. Go to original source...
    18. EUROPEAN UNION, Regulation (EC) No. 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards, Official Journal L 243, 11/09/2002 P 0001-0004 [online]. 2012 [cit. 2014-04-10] http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32002R1606.
    19. EIERLE, B.; SCHLEICHER, M. 2013. Enforcement and Managers' Financial Reporting Behavior: A Review of the Empirical Enforcement Literature. In Andreas Hellman (ed.), Behavior Accounting. Nova Science Publishers. ISBN 978-1-62618-056-7.
    20. EWERT, R.; WAGENHOFER, A. 2005. Economic Effect of Tightening Accounting Standards to Restrict Earnings Management. The Accounting Review. 2005, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1101-1124. Go to original source...
    21. IATRIDIS, G.; JOSEPH, N. L. 2005. A conceptual framework of accounting policy choice under SSAP 20, Managerial Accounting Journal. 2005, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 763-778. Go to original source...
    22. JEANJEAN, T; STOLOWY, H. 2008. Do accounting standards matter? An explanatory analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2008, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 480-494. Go to original source...
    23. JONES, J. J. 1991. Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research. 1991, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 193-228. Go to original source...
    24. LARCKER, D. F.; RICHARDSON, S. A. 2004. Fees Paid to Audit Firms, Accrual Choices, and Corporate Governance. Journal of Accounting Research. 2004, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 625-658. Go to original source...
    25. LANG, M. H.; MAFFETT, M. G.; OWENS, E. L. 2014. Earnings Comovement and Accounting Comparability: The Effect of Mandatory IFRS Adoption [online]. 2010, Working paper No. FR 11-03. Retrieved May 15, 2014 [cit. 2014-04-25] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 1676937.
    26. LANG, M. H.; READY J. S.; WILSON, W. 2006. Earnings management and cross listing: Are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2006, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 255-283. Go to original source...
    27. LEUZ, C. 2003. IAS Versus U.S. GAAP: Information Asymmetry-Based Evidence from Germany's New Market. Journal of Accounting Research. 2003, vol. 41 no. 3, pp. 445-472. Go to original source...
    28. LEUZ, C., VERRECCHIA, R. E. 2000. The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research. 2000, vol. 38 (supplement), pp. 91-124. Go to original source...
    29. MCNICHOLS, M.; WILSON, G. P; DEANGELO, L. 1988. Evidence of earnings management from the provision for bad debts. Journal of Accounting Research. 1988, vol. 26, pp. 1-31. Go to original source...
    30. PACTER, P 2014. Global Accounting Standards - From Vision to Factuality. IASB, CPA Journal [online]. 2014, Retrieved April 7, 2014 [cit. 2014-4-10]..
    31. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2007. SEC takes action to improve consistency of disclosure to U.S. investors in foreign companies [online].Press release 235, Nov. 15, 2007. Retrieved April 7, 2014 [cit. 2014-4-12] http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-235.htm.
    32. VAN TENDELOO, B.; VANSTRELEN, A. 2005. Earnings Management under German GAAP versus IFRS. European Accounting Review. 2005, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 155-180. Go to original source...
    33. WUSTERMANN, J.; KIEZEK, S. 2005. Revenue recognition under IFRS revisited: conceptual models, current proposals and practical consequences. Accounting in Europe. 2005, vol. 2, pp. 69-106. Go to original source...
    34. ZEFF, S. A. 2007. Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a higher level of quality. The British Accounting Review. 2007, vol. 39, pp. 290-302. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content