Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2013, 21(2):25-39 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.397

Selected Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union Focusing on State Aid To the Energy Industry

Matej Šandor, Pavel Černý
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Fakulta mezinárodních vztahů (matej.sandor@vse.cz, pavel.cerny@vse.cz).

The EU energy industry in is becoming increasingly important and its importance can be expected to grow in the future, especially due to security and environmental issues and aspects of liberalization in the energy industry. In addition, state aid, even outside the energy sector, has had a major impact on the subjects of law in the Czech Republic, and that is not only because of the existence of significant grants from the European Union structural funds. The subject of this paper is selected judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union focusing on state aid to the energy industry. The beginning of this paper contains a general discussion of the conditions of energy policy and state aid policy. The following parts of this paper concern selected judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Based on the selected judgments, the aim of this paper is to point out problems of interpretation of the provisions regulating the energy sector and state aid.

Keywords: state aid, energy industry, European Union
JEL classification: H7, K2, K3, Q40, Q48

Published: April 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šandor, M., & Černý, P. (2013). Selected Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union Focusing on State Aid To the Energy Industry. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia21(2), 25-39. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.397
Download citation

References

  1. BEHRENS, A.; EGENHOFER, Ch. Energy policy for Europe: identifying the European added-value. Brussels : CEPS, 2008. ISBN 978-92-9079-773-9.
  2. Rozsudek Soudního dvora C-368/04 Transalpine Ölleitung in Österreich GmbH a další v. Finanzlandesdirektion für Tirol a další ze dne 5. 10. 2006.
  3. Rozsudek Soudního dvora C-384/07 Wienstrom GmbH v. Bundesminister für Wirtschaft und Arbeit ze dne 18. 12. 2008.
  4. Rozsudek Soudního dvora C-480/09P AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA ze dne 16. 12. 2010.
  5. Rozsudek Tribunálu T-53/08 Italská republika v. Evropská komise ze dne 1. 6. 2010.
  6. Rozsudek Tribunálu T-62/08 ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni SpA v. Evropská komise ze dne 1. 6. 2010.
  7. Rozsudek Soudu prvního stupně T-297/02 ACEA SpA v. Komise Evropských společenství ze dne 11. 6. 2009.
  8. SWORA, M. Intelligent Grid: Unfinished Regulation in the Third EU. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law. 2010, vol. 28, no. 4, November, s. 465-480. Go to original source...
  9. ŠTĚPÁNEK, P; ČERNÝ, P; ČERNÝ, P Právní a ekonomické aspekty využívání obnovitelných a alternativních zdrojů energie. Praha 20. 11. 2007. In Zemědělská technika a biomasa 2007 [CD-ROM]. Praha : Výzkumný ústav zemědělské techniky, 2007, s. 184-187. ISBN 978-80-86884-24-0.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.