Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2011, 19(4):25-38 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.338

Application of FIGARCH and EWMA Models on Stock Indices PX and BUX

Zdeněk Štolc
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Fakulta informatiky a statistiky (xstoz04@vse.cz).

Volatility of the financial time series belongs to the crucial estimated parameters in finance (e.g. in risk management, derivative pricing). It is well known, that volatility varies in time, so that new approaches of volatility modeling have appeared. In this paper two models of the conditional heteroskedasticity - fractionally integrated GARCH (FIGARCH) and EWMA are presented. These models are illustrated on the daily historical returns of stock index PX and index BUX. Standard tests of normality, autocorrelation and conditional heteroskedasticity are applied to these log-return time series and before estimating the models, which confirm a usability of the conditional heteroskedasticity models. Empirical results of the Rescale Range analysis (R/S) indicate a long memory in the volatility process of PX index and the first 40 autocorrelations of the square log-returns show their hyperbolic decay. The volatility models are estimated by quasi-maximum likelihood method with Student's t-distribution and used to the calculation of the 1-day 95% and 99% Value at Risk values. Finally, the validity of the models is verified by Kupiec's test, TUFF and Christoffersen's test. These tests demonstrate, that the FIGARCH model is a suitable alternative to the EWMA model in the Value at Risk calculation.

Keywords: PX and BUX indices, fractionally integrated process, FIGARCH, Value at Risk, EWMA
JEL classification: C12, C51, C58

Published: August 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Štolc, Z. (2011). Application of FIGARCH and EWMA Models on Stock Indices PX and BUX. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia19(4), 25-38. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.338
Download citation

References

  1. BAILLIE, R. T.; BOLLERSLEV, T; MIKKELSON, H. O. 1996. Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 1996, vol. 74, s. 3-30. Go to original source...
  2. BOLLERSLEV, T.; WOOLBRIDGE, J. M. 1992. Quasi-maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Time-varying Covariances. Econometric Reviews. 1992, vol. 11, s. 143-172. Go to original source...
  3. CHRISTOFFERSEN, P F 1998. Evaluating Interval Forecasts. International Economic Review. 1998, vol. 39, s. 841-862. Go to original source...
  4. GRANGER, C. W. J. 1980. Long Memory Relationships and the Aggregation of Dynamic Models. Journal of Econometrics. 1980, vol. 14, s. 227-238. Go to original source...
  5. HOSKING, J. R. M. 1981. Fractional Differencing. Biometrika. 1981, vol. 68, s. 165-176. Go to original source...
  6. JORION, P 1997. Value at Risk. 1. vyd. 1997. ISBN 0-7863-0848-6.
  7. J. P. MORGAN. 1996. RiskMetrics - Technical Document. New York : J.P Morgan, 1996. www.jpmorgan.com.
  8. KUPIEC, P 1995. Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. Journal of Derivatives. 1995, vol. 2, s. 174-184. Go to original source...
  9. MANDELBROT, B. 1963. The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices. Journal of Business. 1963, vol. 36, s. 394-419. Go to original source...
  10. TREŠL, J. 1999. Statistické metody a kapitálové trhy. 1. vyd. 1999. ISBN 80-7079-911-0.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.