Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2009, 17(5):70-88 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.284

The Importance of Direct Democracy Tools for the Quality of Political Competition at the National and Local Levels

Petr Chmelík
Masarykova univerzita v Brně, Ekonomicko-správní fakulta (chmelik.petr@email.cz).

Quality of political competition is the essential answer to the question of how people's wishes can be represented and coordinated in the public sphere in the most effective way. The paper defines the forms of political competition on political markets and shows referenda and initiatives as means to stabilize political business cycles and to break politicians' coalitions against the voters by destroying their monopoly on agenda setting and decision-making and by shrinking the informational advantage of the "classe politique" and well-organized interest groups. The mentioned positive effects on the quality of political competition can be demonstrated at both the national and local levels.

Keywords: Economic policy, direct democracy, Political-business cycle, Rent seeking behaviour
JEL classification: H

Published: August 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chmelík, P. (2009). The Importance of Direct Democracy Tools for the Quality of Political Competition at the National and Local Levels. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 17(5), 70-88. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.284
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BENZ, M.; STUTZER, A. 2004. Are Voters Better Informed When They have a Larger Say in Politics? Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland. Public Choice. 2004, vol. 119, no. 1-2, s. 31-59. Go to original source...
    2. BLANKART, CH. B. 1999. Die schleichende Zentralisierung der Staatstätigkeit: Eine Fallstudie. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. 1999, Jg. 119, s. 331-350. Go to original source...
    3. BRENNAN, G.; HAMLIN, A. 2000. Democratic Devices and Desires. Cambridge : C.U.P, 2000. Go to original source...
    4. BUCHANAN, J. M. 2001. Direct Democracy, Classical Liberalism, and Constitutional Strategy. Kyklos. 2001, vol. 54, s. 235-242. Go to original source...
    5. DOWNS, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York : Harper and Row, 1957.
    6. EICHENBERGER, R. 2002. Starker Föderalismus: Drei Reformvorschläge für fruchtbaren politischen Wettbewerb. In WAGSCHAL, U.; HAND, R. (eds.). Der Preis des Föderalismus. Zürich : Orell Füssli, s. 177-199.
    7. EICHENBERGER, R. 1999. Mit direkter Demokratie zu besserer Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik: Theorie und Empirie. In ARNIM, H. H.von (ed.). Adäquate Institutionen: Voraussetzung für "gute" und bürgernahe Politik? Berlin : Duncker&Humboldt, 1999, s. 259-288.
    8. FELD, L. S.; SAVIOZ, M. R. 1998. Vox Populi, Vox Bovi? Ökonomische Auswirkungen direkter Demokratie. In GRÖTZINGER, G.; PANTHER, S. (eds.). Konstitutionelle Politische Ökonomie. Sind unsere gesellschaftlichen Regelsysteme in Form und guter Verfassung? Marburg : Metropolis, 1998, s. 29-80.
    9. FREY, B. S. 1997. Political Business Cycles. New York : Edward Elgar Publishing, 1997.
    10. FREY, B. S.; BOHNET, I. 2001. Democracy by Competion: Referenda and Federalism in Switzerland. In ELAZAR, D. J. (ed.). Commonwealth: The Other Road to Democracy. The Swiss Model of Democratic Self-Goverment. Lanham (MD) : Lexington Books, s. 153-156.
    11. FREY, B. S.; SCHNEIDER, F. 1978. An Empirical Study of Politico-economic Interaction in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistic. 1978, vol. 60, s. 174-183. Go to original source...
    12. FREY, B. S.; STUTZER, A. 2003. Direct Democracy: Designing a Living Constitution [Working Paper No. 167]. Zurich : Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, 2003, s. 1-48. Go to original source...
    13. HIBBS, D. A. 1977. Political Parties in Macroeconomic Policy. The American Political Science Review. 1977, vol. 71, s. 1467-1487. Go to original source...
    14. KIRCHGÄSSNER, G.; FELD, L.; SAVIOZ, M. R. 1999. Die direkte Demokratie: Modern, erfolgreich, entwicklungs- und exportfähig. Basel : Helbing und Lichtenhahn/Valen, 1999.
    15. MUELLER, D. C. 1996. Constitutional Democracy. New York : Oxford University Press, 1996. Go to original source...
    16. MUELLER, D. C.1989. Public Choice II. New York : Cambridge University Press, 1989.
    17. NORDHAUS, W. D. 1975. The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies. 1975, no. 2, s. 169-190. Go to original source...
    18. PERSSON, T; TABELLINI, G. 1993. Designing Institutions for Monetary Stability. Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy. 1993, vol. 39, s. 53-84. Go to original source...
    19. POMMEREHNE, W. W. 1978. Institutional Approaches to Public Expenditure: Empirical Evidence from Swiss Municipalities. Journal of Public Economics. 1978, vol. 9, s. 255-280. Go to original source...
    20. SEIPEL, M.; MAYER, T. 1997. Triumph der Bürger! Mehr Demokratie in Bayern - und wie es weiter geht. München : Mehr Demokratie e. V, 1997. Go to original source...
    21. SCHNEIDER, F.; FREY, B. S. 1997. Politico- Economic Models of Macroeconomic Policy. In FREY, B. S. (ed.). Political Business Cycles. New York : Edward Elgar Publishing, s. 3-39.
    22. STUTZER, A.; FREY, B. S. 2000. Stärkere Volksrechte - Zufriedenere Bürger. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. 2000, vol. 6, issue 3, Autumn. Go to original source...
    23. TOLLISON, R. D. 1982. Rent - Seeking: A Survey. Kyklos. 1982, vol. 35, s. 575-602. Go to original source...
    24. ®ÁK, M. aj. 1999. Velká ekonomická encyklopedie. Praha : Linde, 1999.
    25. ®ÁK, M. 1998. Politicko-ekonomický cyklus. Polická ekonomie. 1998, č. 4, s. 471-480. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content