Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2009, 17(1):3-26 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.1

Interests and principles in foreign policy

Štěpánka Zemanová, Zuzana Trávníčková
Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Fakulta mezinárodních vztahů, Středisko mezinárodních studií Jana Masaryka (zemanova@vse.cz; kalova@vse.cz).

The foreign policy of a sovereign state is a complicated decision-making process. Both security and economic interests of the state as well as its long-term values (more likely values of a moral nature) must be taken into account here. The paper deals with the relation between economic and trade policy (representing interests) on the one hand and human rights protection and promotion (representing principles) on the other. Basic conflicts between economic interests and other principles that have to be considered in decision-making are analysed. Furthermore, their role in foreign policy formation is examined. Finally, the paper draws attention to methodical problems of the analysis of the relation between interests and principles.

Keywords: Foreign policy, Human rights, International trade
JEL classification: F13, F50

Published: February 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zemanová, Š., & Trávníčková, Z. (2009). Interests and principles in foreign policy. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia17(1), 3-26. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.1
Download citation

References

  1. APODACA, C. 2001. Global Economic Patterns and Personal Integrity Rights after the Cold War. International Studies Quarterly. 2001, vol. 45, no. 4, s. 587-602. Go to original source...
  2. ARTS, C. 2000. Integrating Human Rights into Development Cooperation: The Case of Lomé Convention. The Hague : Kluwer Law International, 2000. Go to original source...
  3. BAEHR, P. R.; CASTERMANS-HOLLEMAN, M. 2001. The role of Human Rights in Foreign Policy. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
  4. BAEHR, P. R. 2000. Trials and errors: The Netherlands and Human Rights. In FORSYTHE, D. P. (ed.). Human Rights and Comparative Foreign Policy. Tokio : United Nations University Press, 2000, s. 49-86.
  5. BAYLEY, S. D. 1994. The UN Security Council and Human Rights. Houndmills : The Macmillan Press, 1994. Go to original source...
  6. BEETHAM, D.; BOYLE, K. 1995. Introducing Democracy: Eighty Questions and Answers. Cambridge : Polity Press in association with UNESCO, 1995.
  7. BENEŠ, V. aj. 2004. Zahraniční obchod. Praha : Grada, 2004.
  8. BOGUSZAK, J.; ČAPEK, J.; GERLOCH, A. 2001. Teorie práva. Praha : Eurolex Bohemia, 2001.
  9. BOUANDEL, Y. 1997. Human Rights and Comparative Politics. Dartmouth : Dartmouth Publishing Company, 1997.
  10. BUZAN, B. 2001. Další zkoumání problému analytických rovin v mezinárodních vztazích. In BOOTH, K.; SMITH, S. (eds.). Současné teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Brno : Barrister & Principal, 2001.
  11. CARR, E. H. 1947. International Relations between the Two World Wars. London : Macmillan, 1947.
  12. CIHELKOVÁ, E.; NEUMANN, P. 1996. Ekonomické změny ve Spoj ených státech amerických. In Proměny světové ekonomiky a Česká republika. Bělá pod Bezdězem : Nakladatelství Máchova kraje, 1996.
  13. DANAHER, K. 1984. In Whose Interest? A Guide to U.S.-South African Relations. Washington (DC) : Institute for Policy Studies, 1984.
  14. DAVID, V.; SLADKÝ, P.; ZBOŘIL, F. 2004. Mezinárodní právo veřejné. Praha : Linde, 2004.
  15. DAVIS, I. 1998. European Integration and the Arms Trade: Creating a New Moral Imperative? In McSWEENEY, B. (ed). Moral Issues in International Affairs, Problems of European Integration. NewYork : St. Martin's Press, 1998. Go to original source...
  16. DONNELLY, J. 1998. International Human Rights. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.
  17. DRULÁK, P.; DRULÁKOVÁ, R. 2000. Tvorba a analýza zahraniční politiky. Praha: VŠE, 2000.
  18. DRULÁK, P. 2003. Teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Praha : Portál, 2003.
  19. EGELAND, J. 1988. Impotent Superpower- Potent Small State, Potentials and Limitations of Human Rights Objectives in the Foreign Policies of the United States and Norway. Oslo : Norwegian University Press, 1988.
  20. FERDOWSI, M. A. 1995. Sicherhe it und Frieden jenseits der Bipo I arität: Entwicklungstendenzen - Probleme - Perspektiven. In OPITZ, P. J. (ed.). Weltprobleme. Bonn : Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 1995, s. 159-184.
  21. FORSYTHE, D. P. 2000. Human Rights in International Relations. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000. Go to original source...
  22. FROST, M. 2001. The ethics of humanitarian intervention: protecting civilians to make democratic citizenship possible. In SMITH, K.; LIGHT, M. (eds.). Ethics and Foreign Policy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2001, s. 33-54. Go to original source...
  23. GEIST, B. 1992. Sociologický slovník. Praha : Victoria Publishing, 1992.
  24. GIBNEY, M.; DALTON, M. 2007. The Po I itical Terror Scale [online]. Dostupný z www.unca. edu/politicalscience/faculty-staff/Gibney%20Doc/Gibney%20Political%20Terror%20S-cale.pdf [cit. 1. 4. 2007].
  25. GILLS, B.; ROCAMORA, J. 1992. Low Intensity Democracy. Third World Quarterly. 1992, vol. 13, no. 3, s. 501-523. Go to original source...
  26. GOULD, C. C. 2004. Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004. Go to original source...
  27. HÁJEK, J. 1998. Úsilí o lidská práva v dějinách. In 50 let Všeobecné deklarace lidských práv [Skriptum]. Praha : VŠE, 1998, s. 9-24.
  28. HARLOW, C. 2006. Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Val ues. European Journal of International Law. 2006, no. 1, s. 187-214. Go to original source...
  29. HIGGINS, R. 2001. Problems and Process: International Law and how we use It. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2001.
  30. HOLLIS, M.; SMITH, S. 1990. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1990.
  31. HURRELL, A. 2002. Norms and Ethics in International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations. London : Sage Publications, 2002, s. 116-145. Go to original source...
  32. ISHAY, M. R. 2004. The history of Human Rights, From ancient times to the globalization era. Berkeley : University of California Press, 2004.
  33. JABINE, T. B.; CLAUDE, R. P. (eds.). 1992. Human Rights and Statistics. Pennsylvania : University of Pensylvania Press, 1992. Go to original source...
  34. JELÍNEK, P. 2004. Transformace českého systému rozvojové spolupráce. Mezinárodní politika. 2004, ročník XXVIII, č. 11,s. 14-16.
  35. KEOHANE, R. O.; NYE, J. 2001. Power and Interdependence. NewYork : Longman, 2001.
  36. KINGSBURY, B.; KIRSCH, N.; STEWART, R. B. 2005. The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law & Contemporary Problems. 2005, no. 3, s. 15-61. Go to original source...
  37. KIRSCH, N.; KINGSBURY, B. 2006. Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order. European Journal of International Law. 2006, no. 1, s. 1-13. Go to original source...
  38. KOSEK, J. 2003. Věda to je určitě, ale o čem? Kapitoly z psychologie. Praha : Baset, 2003.
  39. KRAUSE, J. 1995. Eine Welt in Waffen: Das Rustungsproblem in der Internationalen Politik. In KAISER, K.; SCHWARZ, H.-P. (eds.). DieNeue Weltpolitik. Bonn : Bundeszentralefur politische Bildung, 1995, s. 147-156.
  40. KREJČÍ, O. 1997. Mezinárodní politika. Praha : Victoria Publishing, 1997.
  41. KUBICEK, P. J. (ed.). 2003. European Union and Democratization, Introduction. London : Rout led ge, 2003. Go to original source...
  42. KUNCZIK, M. 2004. Images of Nations and International Public Relations. In Public Diplomacy and Media. Dubrovnik : Diplomatic Academy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2004.
  43. KVÁČA, V. 2003. Politická nestabilita v Africe, 1960-2000. Mezinárodní vztahy. 2003, roč. 38, č. 4, s. 47-73. Go to original source...
  44. LEBOW, R. N. 2003. The tragic vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003. Go to original source...
  45. MALENOVSKÝ, J. 2002. Mezinárodní právo veřejné. Obecná část. 3. opravené a doplněné vydání. Brno : Doplněk, 2002.
  46. MERTUS, J. A. 2004. Bait and Switch: Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy. New York : Rout led ge, 2004.
  47. MEYER, W. H. 1998. Human Rights and International Political Economy in Third World Nations, Multinational Corporations, Foreign Aid and Repression. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1998.
  48. MZV. 2003. Koncepce zahraniční politiky České republiky na léta 2003-2006 [online]. Dostupné z www.mzv.cz/servis/soubor.asp7icN4191 [cit. 1. 1. 2007].
  49. MZV. 2002. Programové prohlášení vlády 2002 [online]. Dostupné z www.mzv.cz/ser-vis/soubor.asp?id=3192 [cit. 1. 1. 2007].
  50. NG, A. 2004. Playing the Democracy Card: European Democracy Promotion [online]. Institute for European Studies, Cornell University. Dostupné zwww.einaudi.cornell.edu/euro-pe/iniciativeslpdf/Ng.pdf [cit. 30. 11. 2005].
  51. PAUL, V. 1996. Nejstarší památky mezinárodního práva. Praha : Academia, 1996.
  52. PITHART, P. 2005. Budování státu pokračuje. Mezinárodní politika. 2005, roč. XXIX, č. 11, s. 21-23.
  53. PLECHANOVOVÁ, B.; FIDLER, J. 1997. Kapito ly z dějin mezinárodních vztahů 1941-1995. Praha : Institut pro středoevropskou politiku a kulturu, 1997.
  54. POTOČNÝ, M. 1996. Mezinárodní právo veřejné. Zvláštní část. Praha :, C. H. Beck, 1996.
  55. REYNOLDS, P. A. 1971. An introduction to international relations. Gateshead : Longman, 1971.
  56. RISSE, T.; SIKKINK, K. 2000. The socialisation of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction. In RISSE, T.; ROPP, S.; SIKKINK, K. (eds.). The Power of Human Rights, International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000, s. 1-38. Go to original source...
  57. SAMUELSON, P. A.; NORDHAUS, W. D. 1991. Ekonomie. Praha : Svoboda, 1991.
  58. SCHMITZ, H. P.; SIKKINK, K. 2002. International Human Rights, International Organizations and Institutions. In Handbook of International Relations. London : Sage Publications, 2002, s. 492-526. Go to original source...
  59. SIMMONS, B. A.; MARTIN, L. L. 2002. International Organizations and Institutions. In Handbook of International Relations. London : Sage Publications, 2002, s. 181-204. Go to original source...
  60. STEINER, H. J.; ALSTON, P. 2000. International Human Rights in Context, Law, Politics, Morals. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000.
  61. SUDRE, F. 1997. Mezinárodní a evropské právo lidských práv. Brno : Masarykova univerzita, 1997
  62. TESAŘ, F. 2003. Zbrojní embarga: logická, častá, neúčinná. Mezinárodní politika. 2003, roč. XXVII, č. 6, s. 11-13.
  63. TOMÁŠ, R. 2003. Americké hospodářské sankce v 90. letech 20. století - obtížná cesta k reformě sankční politiky. Mezinárodní vztahy. 2003, roč. 38, č. 3, s. 44-63.
  64. VLÁDA ČR. 2004. Programové prohlášení vlády 2004 [online]. Dostupné z www.vlada.cz/fi-les/vlada/prohlaseni.pdf [cit. 1.1. 2007].
  65. WHITEHEAD, L. (ed.). 2005. The International Dimension of Democratization, Europe and the Americas. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005.
  66. WORLD BANK. 2005. Governance Indicators 1996-2004 [online]. Dostupné z www.worl-dbank.org/wbi/governance/govdata/.
  67. WRIGHT, S. 2001. International Human Rights, Decolonisation and Globalisation: Becoming Human. London : Routledge, 2001.
  68. ZEMANOVÁ, Š. aj. 2004. Lidská dimenze mezinárodních vztahů. Praha : VŠE, Nakladatelství Oeco no mi ca, 2004.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.