Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2008, 16(5):22-31 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.159

Sociological and Social-psychological Research in the Organizations and Its Use

Alois Surynek
PhDr. Alois Surynek - odborný asistent, Katedra psychologie a sociologie řízení, Fakulta podnikohospodářská, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.

The papers present problems of using of sociological empirical researchs in organizations. There are questions of cognition of organizations especially questions of behavior of employees. Author focus on differences of theoretical, empirical and common cognition and show, that this differences create mistakes of an assignment concrete empirical survey. Author see the resolution in the exact definition of purpose of survey.

Keywords: Empirical research, organizational behavior, purpose of survey
JEL classification: M12

Published: August 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Surynek, A. (2008). Sociological and Social-psychological Research in the Organizations and Its Use. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 16(5), 22-31. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.159
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AL-HEMOUND, A., M.; AL-ASFOOR, M., M. 2006. A behavior based safety approach at a Kuwait research institution. Journal of Safety Research. Chicago : 2006, Vol. 37, Iss. 2, s. 201. Go to original source...
    2. APPELBAUM, S., H.; SOLTERO, I., U.: NEVILLE, K. 2005. The Creation of An Unethical Work Environment: Organizational Outcome-Based Control Systems. Equal Opportunities International. Patring-ton : 2005, Vol. 24, Iss. 2, s. 67. Go to original source...
    3. BOISVERT, H. 2006. Building more efficient businesses. CMA Management. Hamilton : 2006, Vol. 79, Iss. 9, s 32.
    4. BUHMAN, CH.; KEKRE, S.; SINGHAL, J. 2005. Interdisciplinary and Interorganizational Research: Establishing the science of enterprise networks. Productions and Operations Management. Muncie : 2005, Vol 14., Iss. 4, s. 493. Go to original source...
    5. BURCHELL, J.; COOK, J. 2006. Its good to talk? Examining attitudes towards corporate social responsibility dialogue and engangement processes. Business Ethics. Oxford: 2006, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, s. 154. Go to original source...
    6. Corman, Steven, R. 2005. Growing up in turbulent times. Management Communication Quarterly. Thou-sand Oaks : 2005, Vol. 18, Iss. 4, s. 604. Go to original source...
    7. COX, J., W.; HASSARD, J. 2005. Triangulation in organizational research: A Re-presentation. Organi-zation. London : 2005, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, s. 109. Go to original source...
    8. GEPPERT, M. 2005. Competence development and learning in British and German subsidiaries of MNCs: Why and how national institutions still matter. Personnel Review. Farnborough : 2005, Vol 34, Iss. 2, s. 155. Go to original source...
    9. IRLENBUSCH, B. 2006. Experimental perspectives on Incentives in Organizations. Central European Journal of Operations Research. Heidelberg : 2006, Vol 14, Iss. 1, s. 1. Go to original source...
    10. JARMAN, R. 2005. When Success Isn't Everything - Case Studies of Two Virtual Teams. Group Decisi-on andNegotiation. Dordrecht: 2005, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, s.333. Go to original source...
    11. JUDD, L., R. 1987. Role Relationships Using Research and Organization Types. Public Relations Review. Sarasota : 1987, Vol. 13., Iss. 2., s. 52. Go to original source...
    12. KONOPÁSEK, Z. Sociologie jako power play. http://www.cts.cuni.cz/~konopas/texty/powerpl.htm. [18. 12. 2006]
    13. METTANEN, P. 2005. Design and implementation of a performance measurement systém for a research organization. Productionplanning&Control. London: 2005, Vol 16, Iss. 2., s. 178. Go to original source...
    14. PAVLICA, K. a kol. 2000. Sociální výzkum, podnik a management. Průvodce manažera v oblasti výzkumu hospodářských organizací. Praha : Ekopress, 2000.
    15. RYNES, S., L.; GEBHART, B.; PARKS, L. 2005. Personnel psychology: performance evaluation andpay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology. 2005, Vol. 56, s 571. Go to original source...
    16. Sheehan, C. 2005. A model for HRM strategic intergration. Personnel Review. Farnborough, 2005, Vol 34, Iss. 2., s 192. Go to original source...
    17. SHIPTON, H.; FAY, D.; DAWSON, J.; WEST, M. 2006. How HR can inspire the teamwork that allows innovation to flourish. People Management. London : 2006, Vol. 12, Iss. 14, s. 44.
    18. SURYNEK, A.; KOMÁRKOVÁ, R.; KAšPAROVÁ, E. Základy sociologického výzkumu. 2001. Praha : Management Press, 2001
    19. Velký sociologický slovník I. a/o. 1996. Praha : Univerzita Karlova, vydavatelství Karolinum, 1996. ISBN 80-7184-164-1.
    20. WATERS, J., A.; SALIPANTE, P., F. JR; NOTZ, W., W. 1978. The Experimenting Organization: Using the Results of Behavioral Science Research. The Academy of Management Review. 1978, 3, 3. s 483. Go to original source...
    21. WOOD, R. 2005. New frontiers for self-regulation research in IO psychology. Applied Psychology. Oxford : 2005, Vol. 54, Iss. 2, s. 192. Go to original source...
    22. ZAHEER, A.; BELL, G., G. 2005. Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Mangement Journal. Chichester: 2005, Vol. 26., Isss. 9., s. 809. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content