Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2008, 16(2):90-108 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.59

Changing Regionalism in South-East Asia: some theoretical and practical aspects

Zuzana Stuchlíková
Ing. Zuzana Stuchlíková - research fellow; Department of World Economy, Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, Prague, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, Czech Republic, stuchliz@vse.cz

There are many sophisticated discussions about the possible effects of the regional economic cooperation. Their results have been ambiguous. However, it is evident that regional trade agreements (RTAs) have been increasingly transforming international trade, especially since the second half of the 1990s. The region of South-East Asia has become more interested in such cooperation only after the Asian financial crisis in 1997. Especially the case of Japan proves how the Asian governments have changed their approach to the international economic cooperation. They shifted the emphasis from the multilateral negotiations under the umbrella of the WTO to regional and bilateral agreements. However, despite its fast pace the process of regionalism in South-East Asia is still at the very beginning. It remains to be seen whether the Asian countries will stay on the level of broader FTAs or whether they will follow the European example of a deep economic and political integration.

Keywords: regionalism, trade agreements, integration
JEL classification: F02, F13, F14, F15, F52, F53, F59

Published: April 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Stuchlíková, Z. (2008). Changing Regionalism in South-East Asia: some theoretical and practical aspects. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia16(2), 90-108. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.59
Download citation

References

  1. ADB (2007). Asian Development Outlook 2007 - Growth Amid Change. Hong Kong, The Asian Development Bank (ADB)
  2. ARIC (2007). FTA Trends. Asia Regional Integration Centre.
  3. APTIAD (2007). Glossary. Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Agreements Database.
  4. BALDWIN, R. E. (2007). Managing the Noodle Bowl: the Fragility of East Asian Regionalism. Working Paper, No. 7, Asian Development Bank.
  5. BALDWIN, R. E. (2003). East Asian Regionalism: A Comparison with Europe. Geneva, Graduate Institute of International Studies.
  6. BERGSTEN, C. F. (1997). Open Regionalism. The World Economy, Vol. 20, No. 5. Go to original source...
  7. CIHELKOVÁ, E. et al. (2007). Nový regionalismus - teorie a případová studie (Evropská unie). Praha, C. H. Beck.
  8. DENT, Ch. (2006). The New Economic Bilateralism in Southeast Asia: Region-Convergent or Region-Divergent? International Relations of Asia-Pacific, Vol. 6, No. 1. Go to original source...
  9. ESCAP (2007). Economic and Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific 2007 - Surging Ahead in Uncertain Times. New York, United Nations.
  10. GILL, I.; KHARAS, H. (2007). An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Economic Growth. Washington, The World Bank. Go to original source...
  11. HNÁT, P. (2007). Bilaterální regionální integrace v Evropě a Asii: vliv na regionální a světový obchodní řád. In Současná Evropa a Česká republika, No. 1.
  12. JETRO (2007). White Paper on International Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. Tokyo, JETRO.
  13. JONES, R. S.; YOON, T. (2006). Strengthening the Integration of Japan in the World Economy to benefit more fully from Globalization. WP No. 526, Paris, OECD.
  14. KAWASAKI, K. (2003). The Impact of Free Trade Agreements in Asia. Tokyo, RIETI, 2003.
  15. LEE, Ch. S.; PAR, S. Ch. (2006). An Examination of the Formation of Natural Trading Blocs in East Asia. Asian Economic Papers, pp. 90-103. Go to original source...
  16. MOFA (2006). Diplomatic Bluebook 2006. Tokyo, 2006.
  17. Ministry of Finance of Japan (2002). New Economic Prospects in Asia Research Committee Report (Press Release). Tokyo.
  18. MUNAKATA, N. (2001). Evolution of Japan's Policy toward Economic Integration. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 02-E-006, Tokyo, RIETI.
  19. NAKAMURA, T.; SHINAHARA, T. (2007). External Aspects of East Asian Economies and Finance - in light of growing interest in regional integration. Tokyo, Bank of Japan.
  20. PANGESTU, M. (2006). Visions of East Asia: Three Engines for a Way Forward. In East Asia Visions: Perspectives on Economic Development. Washington, The World Bank.
  21. STUCHLÍKOVÁ, Z.; HNÁT, P. (2007). Regionalism as a Part of Regional Governance: Europe and South-East Asia. WP No. 3, Prague, University, of Economics.
  22. STUCHLÍKOVÁ, Z. (2007). Multilateralism and New Regionalism: Changing Japans Approach in the Global Context. In NĚMEC, J. (ed.). Global and Regional Governance -Europe and Beyond. Prague, Nakladatelství Oeconomica, 2007, pp. 56-75.
  23. TAN NUO, J. (2003). The possibility of an Asian monetary union drawing form the EMU experience. In Asia Europe Journal, pp. 371-401.
  24. UNCTAD (2007a). Handbook of Statistics 2006-2007. Geneva, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  25. UNCTAD (2007b). Trade and Development Report 2007. New York and Geneva, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  26. UNESCAP (2007). Regional Trade Agreements -Axes of Consolidation and Integration in Asia. UNESCAP, 2007.
  27. WALL, J. H. (2002). Has Japan Been Left Out in the Cold by Regional Integration? Monetary and Economic Studies. Tokyo, Bank of Japan. Go to original source...
  28. YYMAZAWA, I. (2004). Japan and the East Asian Economies: Prospects and Retrospect in the Early Twenty-First Century. WP No. 1, IDE APEC Study Centre.
  29. YOSHIDA, T. (2004). East Asian Regionalism and Japan. WP No. 9, IDE APEC Study Centre.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.