Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2007, 15(1):45-56 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.37
Incidence of the VAT Rates Harmonisation in the Czech Republic
- 1 Ing. Stanislav Klazar, Ph.D., - odborný asistent; Katedra veřejných financí, Fakulta financí a účetnictví, VŠE v Praze, klazar@vse.cz.
- 2 Ing. Barbora Slintáková, Ph.D. - odborná asistentka; Katedra veřejných financí, Fakulta financí a účetnictví, VŠE v Praze, barbora@vse.cz.
- 3 doc. Ing. Slavomíra Svátková, Ph.D.; Katedra veřejných financí, Fakulta financí a účetnictví, VŠE v Praze, svatkova@vse.cz.
- 4 Mgr. Ing. Martin Zelený, Ph.D. - odborný asistent; Katedra ekonomické statistiky, Fakulta informatiky a statistiky, VŠE v Praze, zelenym@vse.cz.
This paper reports results of the research concerning incidence of the value added tax in the Czech Republic over the period 1993-2004. The aim of our research was to analyse the impact of the harmonisation of the VAT rates connected with the entry of the Czech Republic into the EU on the distribution of the tax burden among households with different attributes including income. In our analysis we used 2004 Household Budget Survey data on consumption expenditures and various households' attributes. Considerable issue of our research was to estimate the VAT burden for each household in the statistical survey before and after the entry into the EU. We found out that the VAT burden of Czech households increased after the VAT rates harmonisation. Important result of our analysis was that the Czech VAT is progressive. The progressivity of the VAT is probably caused by a design of the tax when different items of household consumption are taxed at different rates including exemptions. Moreover, we found out that the Czech VAT was more progressive when the VAT was introduced than in time of the accession to the EU.
Keywords: VAT, tax incidence, progressivity of taxation
JEL classification: H22, H23
Published: February 1, 2007 Show citation
References
- BRADFORD, D. F. (ed.), 1995: Distributional Analysis of Tax Policy. Washington D. C., The AEI Press, 1995.
- CASPERSEN, E. - METCALF, G. E., 1993: Is a Value Added Tax Progressive? Annual Versus Lifetime Incidence Measures. Working Paper No 4387. Cambridge (USA), NBER, 1993. Dostupné na http://www.nber.org/papers/w4387 [on-line, cit. 2006-06-19].
Go to original source...
- ČNB, 2003: The Impact of the Czech Republic's Accession to the European Union on Consumer Prices in the Czech Republic. Praha. Česká národní banka, 2003. Monetary policy strategic documents series. dostupné na http://www.cnb.cz/www.cnb.cz/en/monetary_policy/strategic_documents/download/cr_eu_access_price_impacts.pdf [on-line, cit. 2006-06-19].
- EC, 2000: Tax Policy in the European Union. Luxembourg, European Commission, 2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- EC, 2006: VAT Rates Applied in the Member States of the European Community. Brussels. European Commission, 2006. DOC/1803/2006-EN. dostupné na http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/vat/how_vat_works/rates/vat_rates_2006_en.pdf [on-line, cit. 2006-06-19].
- FEENBERG, D. R. - MITRUSI, A. W. - POTERBA, J. M., 1997: Distributional Effects of Adopting a National Retail Sales Tax. Working Paper, 1997, No 5885. Cambridge (USA). NBER. Dostupné na http://www.nber.org/papers/w5885 [online, cit. 2006-06-19]
Go to original source...
- FERNANDEZ-CORUGEDO, E., 2004: Consumption Theory. Handbooks in Central Banking, No 23. London. Centre for Central Banking Studies. Bank of England. dostupné na http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/education/ccbs/handbooks/pdf/ccbshb23.pdf [on-line, cit. 2006-06-19].
- FULLERTON, D. - ROGERS, D. L., 1991: Lifetime vs. Annual Perspectives on Tax Incidence. Working Paper, 1991, No 3750. Cambridge (USA). NBER. dostupné na http://www.nber.org/papers/w3750 [on-line, cit. 2004-01-10].
Go to original source...
- FULLERTON, D. - ROGERS, D. L., 1995: Distributional Effects on a Lifetime Basis. In Bradford, D.F. (ed.): Distributional Analysis of Tax Policy. Washington, D.C., The AEI Press.
Go to original source...
- JOUMARD, I., 2001: Tax Systems in European Union Countries. OECD. Economics Department Working Papers, 2001, No 301. ECO/WKP (2001) 27. Dostupné na http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2001doc.nsf/43bb6130e5e86e5fc12569fa005d004c/c1256985004c66e3c1256a7a004cd064/$FILE/JT00110384.DOC [online, cit. 2006-06-19].
- MATHIS, A., 2004: VAT Indicators. Taxation Papers. Working Paper, 2004, No 2. European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. dostupné na http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/vat_indicators.pdf [on-line, cit. 2006-06-19].
- METCALF, G. E., 1994: Lifecycle vs. Annual Perspectives on the Incidence of a Value Addes Tax. Working Paper, 1994, No 4619. Cambridge (USA). NBER. Dostupné na http://www.nber.org/papers/w4619 [on-line, cit. 2006-06-19].
Go to original source...
- METCALF, G. E., 1998: A Distributional Analysis of an Environmental Tax Shift. Working Paper, 1998, No 6546. Cambridge (USA). NBER. Dostupné na http://www.nber.org/papers/w6546 [on-line, cit. 2006-06-19].
Go to original source...
- POTERBA, J. M., 1989: Lifetime Incidence and the Distributional Burden of Excise Taxes. Working Paper, 1989, No 2833. Cambridge (USA). NBER. dostupné na http://www.nber.org/papers/w2833 [on-line, cit. 2004-01-19].
Go to original source...
- ŠIROKÝ, J., 2004: Jak se liší náš zákon a Šestá směrnice. Ekonom, 2004, č. 39, s. 60-61.
- SVÁTKOVÁ, S. - SLINTÁKOVÁ, B. - KLAZAR, S. - ZELENÝ, M., 2004: Teoreticko-metodologická a legislativní východiska pro analýzu zatížení spotřebního koše daněmi ze spotřeby. Oponovaná studie. Praha, VŠE v Praze, 2004.
- SVÁTKOVÁ, S. - SLINTÁKOVÁ, B. - KLAZAR, S. - ZELENÝ, M., 2005: Sběr dat pro klasifikaci CZ-COICOP - analytická studie. Oponovaná studie. Praha, VŠE v Praze, 2005.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.